A Fork in the "Rhodes"

A winter road splits into two paths

Snapshot: In this fictional case set at Harvard College, an African American college student with South African and Zimbabwean ancestry grapples with whether to apply for the prestigious Rhodes Scholarship, knowing that its creator and primary funder spread white supremacy and imperialism across the African continent. Should Cecil Rhodes’s historical legacy impact her decision—and if so, in what direction?

Detailed Case Description:

In this case, Layla, a high-achieving college senior, must determine whether to apply for the Rhodes Scholarship. While excited about the opportunities becoming a Rhodes Scholar would offer her, Layla has serious reservations, given Cecil Rhodes' legacy of white supremacy, racism, and imperialism. Her own family roots in South Africa and Zimbabwe make her particularly hesitant to take what she sees as "blood money," but others advise her that her family history actually makes her an ideal scholarship recipient. What would it mean for Layla to be a Rhodes Scholar in the context of the founder's legacy, the program's prestigious reputation, and her own identities?  

This case helps groups consider how the legacies of slavery reverberate through academia today. How should prominent historical figures’ beliefs and actions impact the ways that institutions and individuals view “honors” associated with those figures (like scholarships)? How can individuals make ethical decisions at institutions whose entanglements with slavery and its legacies feel ethically compromised?

This case is also part of the Legacies and Lessons learning pathway, a collection of cases unpacking institutional ties to slavery with support resources.