What's in a Name?

red brick academic building

Snapshot: A committee at a fictional college revisits their decision to rename an administrative building in the face of new understanding of the founder’s ties to slavery. Students and activists are demanding more sweeping changes, including renaming the entire college to address systemic racism, while some faculty and alumni emphasize preserving tradition and legacy. What responsibilities do universities have to reconsider whom they memorialize, and how should they weigh different stakeholder perspectives? 

 

 

Detailed Case Description

In this case, set at a fictional liberal arts college, a group of administrators and students on the Committee on Historical Memory meet to discuss their institution’s approach to renaming. The previous academic year, the college released a report detailing its namesake’s connections to slavery and renamed the central administration building. However, some students are now calling for further action—including renaming the school itself. College affiliates are divided, and administrators must weigh what to do next. 

What responsibilities do universities have to reconsider whom they memorialize? How should they weigh different stakeholder perspectives? How might different approaches to naming promote or impede belonging on campus?

 

Explore Further

This case is also part of the Legacies and Lessons learning pathway, a collection of cases unpacking institutional ties to slavery with support resources.