The 2016 election saw a notable rise in divisive political rhetoric and policy proposals. This conversation has spilled into classrooms, as students bring with them to class what they see and hear from news, social media, parents, neighbors, and family members.
This case, "Walling Off or Welcoming In? The Challenge of Creating Inclusive Spaces in Diverse Contexts," describes a School Culture Committee (SCC) at the Jersey City K-8 school. Educators and parents on the committee wrestle with a series of events that challenged their ability to maintain inclusive learning environments that are welcoming to all students. The SCC must determine where and how to draw boundaries between free political speech and offensive or harmful speech that qualifies as bullying or harassment.
This case is designed to help teachers, school and district leaders, parents, teacher educators, and middle and high school students have nuanced conversations about the challenges posed by divisive political rhetoric for school classrooms and communities. The case raises important pedagogical, ethical, democratic, legal, and political considerations, and invites readers to reflect on them both on their own and in dialogue with others.
There is also a recent real-life case in Maryland that has generated multiple perspectives about whether public school teachers' posting of Shepard Fairey posters was appropriately inclusive of diverse students or exclusive by implying anti-Trump sentiments. The teachers have been directed to take the posters down, which has inspired strong views on various sides.
See the authors discuss the case below!